Ashers Bakery appeal to the Supreme Court

In my email feed today was a story titled “Ashers: ‘Support same-sex marriage’ Supreme Court hearing is overand it got me thinking about a long running story that I have already blogged about (see here and here), concerning the Northern Ireland bakers that refused to bake a cake containing an inscription they disagreed with, on conscience grounds, and were prosecuted and penalized for discriminatory behavior, and now they are appealing against the decision – yet again. This is what the article says:

The Ashers hearing has finished at the Supreme Court. After two days of legal argument, the five judges have adjourned to consider their ruling. A decision is expected before the end of the year. Northern Ireland is the only part of the UK where same-sex marriage is illegal. Despite that, action was taken against Ashers bakery for failing to fulfil an order for a gay marriage campaign cake. The taxpayer-funded Equality Commission for Northern Ireland has spent £150,000 pursuing the bakery in the courts. There is a simple issue in this case. Should the law compel someone to endorse a message with which they fundamentally disagree? The public overwhelmingly say NO. Yet a quango is willing to spend phenomenal sums of money to silence a family-run bakery that believes marriage should be between a man and a woman. We need to stand together against those who would take away our free speech.”

The subject of homosexuality has interested me for a long time and the reason is to do with my mantra as a gospel preaching community activist that seeks to engage with the market place of ideas and earning the right to do so by getting involved with and serving the wider community, including the LBGT one. But at the same time, I find I am having to defend the truth and those whose conscience won’t allow them to renege on the truth even when societal pressures try to force them to take to the easy path, but also trying to see things from the perspective of LBGT folk, and trying to understand their legitimate concerns over discrimination. A lot of water has passed under the bridge since the Bed and Breakfast owners were prosecuted for not giving a double bed room to a gay couple. This included same sex marriage being made legal and the Christian community to which I am attached becoming more LBGT aware and inclusive. It also led to my writing a book titled: “The Gay Conundrum” and a number of blog articles subsequent to this. The societal pendulum has swung steadily toward greater acceptance of same sex relationships and attention has now shifted toward tackling the transgender conundrum.

I do not wish to go over arguments on the rightness or otherwise of same sex relationships and the pastoral and other implications for Christians who believe similarly to I do as well as those who sadly in my view have preferred to be beholden to what the surrounding culture thinks on such matters rather than why God thinks, when dealing with LBGT folk, given these are laid out in my earlier book and an e-book that brings together these subsequent articles. What I would like to do, however, is to lay out my store by way of a summary as to what I believe concerning the Ashers case and wider:

  1. Prosecuting the Ashers is unjust and wrong (something even Peter Tatchell agrees with).
  2. If the Ashers had discriminated against their client or behaved in a hateful manner then there may be a case to answer.
  3. Sin is to be avoided if we are to live according to God’s will and that includes sex outside of marriage between a man and a woman. Churches do a disservice when ignoring this.
  4. We are all sinners and Christians should be proportionate in their condemnation, or better not to condemn at all. Sadly, there is still a propensity among Christians to prioritise what sinful behavior is acceptable and what isn’t, which is God’s prerogative alone.
  5. Christians are beholden to practice truth and righteousness, which inevitably bring them into conflict with societal norms when they take this mandate seriously.
  6. Personally, I couldn’t care one jot if a person is gay (other than my concern for all to follow the will of God). All my friends are sinners so there is no room for discrimination, and some friends happen to be gay and maybe in a gay relationship, which as far as our relationship is concerned has not been an issue.
  7. Whether we like it or not, we are in a culture war, and how LBGT issues are resolved form part of that war, the outcome of which has a bearing on the future welfare of humankind. It also can lead to people being penalised for following their conscience and religious beliefs, as in the Ashers case.

One thought on “Ashers Bakery appeal to the Supreme Court

  1. glen says:

    I am gay and support same sex marriage (in fact all marriage). I support adoption by gay couples and I believe we are the ‘natural adopters’ when children are left without parents. In a number of animal species same sex pairs do this. I am concerned that people especially in the US, but also in other countries are trying to use ‘religious freedom’ as an excuse to deny service in shops, hospitals etc to LGBT people. However this was not the case with the Ashers. They did not want to produce a cake with a political message on it that they disagreed with. If I was a baker and someone asked me to bake a cake saying ‘Traditional Marriage is the only real form of marriage’ or ‘God hates Fags’ I would also refuse. So, although I am gay, I would support their right not to do this. However, if I went to them and asked them to sell me a wedding cake and they refused because they knew I was gay, then I would take them to court. However, I do not believe they would do this…

Have your say

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s